And to those of us who have survived, that we might bear witness In doing so, it became apparent to me that Mormon women found that the intensity of female homosociality  available in Mormon structures created a vital space in which they could explore passionate, romantic relationships with each other.
Dean, University of California, Irvine School of Law Gay Rights, Racial Prejudice, and True Equality As the Republicans met last week in Tampa and nominated two men to lead their ticket who are opposed to same sex marriage, it is a good time to recognize that this kind of overt discrimination against gays should be no more tolerable than discrimination based on race, religion or gender.
Many Americans, including Mitt Romney and the CEO of Chick-fil-A, have no difficulty making public statements suggesting that gays and lesbians should have less legal rights than other Americans.
But no public official or CEO would ever argue that African-Americans, Hispanics, religious minorities, or women don't deserve full equal rights under the law. But there really is no difference: InJustice Scalia wrote one of his typical vitriolic dissents arguing that the Supreme Court had no business stating that "opposition to homosexuality is as reprehensible as racial or religious bias.
Is discrimination against gays and lesbians as morally problematic as discrimination based on race? The answer is yes. It is an important question because over forty states ban same-sex marriage, and more than half the states allow discrimination in employment against gays and lesbians.
Congress has refused to add sexual orientation to the list of traits included in our most important national discrimination laws, and a number of states still either prohibit gays from adopting children or make it enormously difficult.
The issue of marriage equality for gays and lesbians almost surely will be before the Supreme Court next term and ultimately the question is whether there is any legitimate interest in discriminating against gays and lesbians. If it would be unthinkable to treat people of color or religious minorities this way, why isn't the same true for gays and lesbians?
The Supreme Court has on many occasions explained why racial discrimination is both immoral and unconstitutional and examining those reasons sheds light on why discrimination against gays and lesbians also should be intolerable.
First, a person's race is simply and obviously irrelevant to whether he or she deserves equal rights under the law. As Martin Luther King said so eloquently, people should be judged by the "content of their character," not by "the color of their skin.
A person's sexual orientation should have no bearing on how she is treated by the government. As long as a person's sexual activities are legal and consensual, why would they be relevant to how a person is treated under the law? To state the obvious, there are moral and immoral gays and lesbians, just as there are moral and immoral heterosexuals.
A person's character should be determined by factors other than his sexual orientation, and his sexual orientation should play no role in determining his legal status. The Court also has said that racial discrimination is impermissible because there has been a long history in the United States of overt public and private discrimination against people because of the color of their skin.
The same is also true for gays and lesbians. In fact, African Americans and other people of color, as well as religious minorities, have received full formal legal protections in this country, but gays and lesbians can still be denied jobs, adoptions, and marriage benefits in most states.
The Supreme Court has also said that discrimination based on race is almost always unconstitutional because people of color have little influence over the electoral process.
The same is obviously true for gays and lesbians who have been unable to persuade Congress to give them full equal rights and cannot get married in over forty states.
Finally, the Supreme Court has repeatedly observed that the government should not treat people unequally because of immutable characteristics, such as race.
There is still a debate in this country over whether sexual orientation is a choice or something people are born with. If orientation is indeed immutable as recent evidence suggeststhen it would be completely unfair to deny people equal rights because of an inherited characteristic.
But, even without a clear answer to this question, a person's sexual orientation simply tells us nothing about his or her fitness to be a teacher, parent, or spouse.
Millions of Americans make private sexual choices that many other Americans would never make, such as having affairs or watching pornography in the privacy of their home, but these people have the same legal rights as people who make more "conventional" sexual choices.
Moreover, embracing a religion is a choice, not an immutable characteristic, yet that choice is fully protected under the law. Fifty years ago, people who argued that school districts should remain racially segregated or that blacks and whites shouldn't be allowed to marry wore their racial prejudice on their sleeves.
Now, those who would deny gays and lesbians the same legal rights as heterosexuals couch their arguments in less egregious sounding phrases like "traditional values," and "protecting our children," but what they are really saying is gays and lesbians don't deserve the same rights as heterosexuals because they are inferior or different.
The debate would be more honest if those against full rights for gays and lesbians wore their prejudice on their sleeves. Religious or moral objections to marriage equality are no more deserving of respect than religious or moral objections to desegregation.
Those who hold such a bias should absorb one of the lessons of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution which prohibits States from denying "any person," the equal protection of the laws.
Gays and lesbians are "persons" and it is well past time they are given the same protections as every other "person. Do you have information you want to share with HuffPost?The Rights of Homosexuals History of Sexuality There have been conscious efforts and changes done to improve the rights of homosexuals, although much discrimination and prejudices against them are still observed around the world.
Homophobia, Heterosexism, and Sexual Prejudice People with homosexual or bisexual orientations have long been stigmatized. With the rise of the gay political movement in the late s, however, homosexuality’s condemnation as immoral, criminal, and sick came under increasing scrutiny.
Mar 29, · The husband has a strong prejudice against the blind. When the two men are alone, the blind man touches the hand of the husband.
At the touch, the husband changes, and he is able to empathise with the blind man.
% FREE Papers on Body discrimination essays. Sample topics, paragraph introduction help, research & more. Class , high school & college.
Example Analysis-Evaluation Essays #1 Webpublished with Student Permission I too have had to truly confront my feelings toward homosexuals rather than hiding behind the concept of this stultifying paranoia just wouldn't exist" ().
He states that "Prejudice against homosexuality sharply limits how all men and women may acceptably. Homosexuality is romantic attraction, sexual attraction or sexual behavior between members of the same sex or initiativeblog.com a sexual orientation, homosexuality is "an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attractions" to people of the same initiativeblog.com "also refers to a person's sense of identity based on those attractions, related .