It is the policy of the State to safeguard the integrity of its territory and the well-being of its citizenry particularly the youth, from the harmful effects of dangerous drugs on their physical and mental well-being, and to defend the same against acts or omissions detrimental to their development and preservation. In view of the foregoing, the State needs to enhance further the efficacy of the law against dangerous drugs, it being one of today's more serious social ills.
Yet there have been repeated calls for the Philippines to reinstate capital punishment, with current Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte wanting to restore it. We present the following arguments to support our position: Observations about the practice of capital punishment point to its discriminatory nature.
In the Philippines, it is typically the poorer sector who get this ultimate penal sanction. The majority of those sentenced to die have incomes below minimum wage FLAG,unable to afford the legal services to defend themselves in a long process CHR, Poorer, less educated Filipinos would not have the intellectual preparedness to think through ways of defending themselves Te, This places them at a serious disadvantage.
Judicial flaws compromise the validity of the death penalty. These may include incompetent counsel, inadequate investigatory services, or even outright police and prosecutorial violations of judicial procedures. In the Philippines, torture or ill treatment of suspects to coerce confessions or to implicate others is commonplace.
Victims often fail to lodge complaints against the police due to intimidation, fear of reprisals, and lack of funds Amnesty International, History also points to gross misapplications of the death penalty law, with vulnerable individuals protected by Philippine law from capital punishment finding themselves on death row.
Inthere were 7 children in death row along with adult convicts Amnesty International, These examples show that it is not always certain whether the right person is convicted and, in this light, the death penalty is too high a price to pay when innocent people are convicted.
The death penalty, and the legal proceedings leading up to it, could exact a huge toll on the psychological wellbeing of victims, offenders, and their families.
Majority of those on death row in the Philippines have been convicted of rape, with incestuous rape as the most common form. Victims of incestuous rape rarely seek the death of their offender but simply desire cessation of abuse, re-establishment of safety, and rehabilitation of their family member.
A possible death penalty sentence for these cases has been noted to keep victims from pursuing charges, and a death sentence for the offender can bring guilt to the victim, further sorrow, and conflict within affected families Madrid et.
In fact, majority of groups representing women and children in the Philippines, who are common victims of death penalty crimes, have taken a stance against capital punishment for rape and incest because they believe it would not solve the problem Kandelia, A common argument for the death penalty is that it brings closure to victims and their loved ones.
Indeed, research shows that some families do experience relief or peace upon imposition of the death penalty on their offenders. Yet in significant number of cases, the death penalty did not bring healing or closure to the offended Vollum and Longmire, This is more in line with the human right to dignity and the absolute value of all human lives, including the lives of those who commit crimes.
Extending the human rights logic, the right to life prevails over the principle of lex talionis i. Even retributive justice, which posits that offenders must be punished and that the degree of punishment should be proportionate to the seriousness of crime, does not automatically and necessarily indicate death as the ultimate penal sanction Carlsmith, Darley, and Robinson,leaving a key question for research about the appropriate maximal penalty for the most serious crimes.
Moral proportionality Carlsmith et al. Given all these, we oppose the reinstatement of the death penalty. Furthermore, we resolve to support efforts to: Something Hanging Over my Head: Child Offenders Under Sentence of Death.
Duterte wants to restore death penalty by hanging. Assessing the impact of the ultimate penal sanction on homicide comparison: A two state comparison.
Marquette law review, 96 1.This paper documents the sources of data used in the construction of the estimates of the Levy Institute Measure of Economic Wellbeing (LIMEW) for the years , , , , , , , , , , , and Death Penalty.
Steve Gardella Position Paper #3 10/30/ Professor Lincoln Passmore (MWR ) The death penalty is a topic of much controversy in the modern world both on a personal level and a geopolitical level.
The Philippines is one of countries that have abolished the death penalty either in law or in practice, as part of a global trend away from capital punishment (Amnesty International, , cited in “The Death Penalty Worldwide”). As a follow-up to Tuesday’s post about the majority-minority public schools in Oslo, the following brief account reports the latest statistics on the cultural enrichment of schools in Austria.
Vienna is the most fully enriched location, and seems to be in roughly the same situation as Oslo. Many thanks to Hermes for the translation from initiativeblog.com A Position Paper on the Death Penalty in the Philippines.
Cuerda Introduction Death penalty is a kind of capital punishment which refers to the sentence of death over a person who has been decided by the government as guilty of committing capital crimes or offences.
Senate of the Philippines GSIS Complex, Pasay City Dear Senator Gordon: The Prolife Philippines Foundation, Incorporated would appreciate it very much to serve as one of your resource organizations should another public hearing is called to discuss the proposal to re-institute the death penalty.